[Flang-dev] new Flang discussions?

Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanliturk at gmail.com
Thu Oct 11 12:56:13 EDT 2018


On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 6:19 PM Stefan Teleman <stefan.teleman at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 11:10 AM Jeff Hammond <jeff.science at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 8:03 AM Roger Ferrer Ibáñez <rofirrim at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Having taken the approach in the past of trying to reuse as much as
>>> C/C++ ASTs for Fortran in our in-house tools, I have to admit I'm not
>>> really enticed by the idea. After all the two languages are very different.
>>>
>>>
>> Can you give some examples of how the languages are very different in a
>> way that would make reuse of the C/C++ AST ineffective?  I understand how
>> the syntax is different, but I don't see major semantic differences that
>> would prevent AST reuse.
>>
>>
> I would be very interested in these C/C++ <-> Fortran incompatibility
> examples as well.
>
> --
> Stefan Teleman
> stefan.teleman at gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> flang-dev mailing list
> flang-dev at lists.flang-compiler.org
>
> http://lists.flang-compiler.org/mailman/listinfo/flang-dev_lists.flang-compiler.org




I think :

One primary example would be  "FORMAT" statement ,
Another may be ; Object time DIMENSION .
Another may be : NAMELIST .
Another may be : In READ/WRITE statements  : ( ... , ERR=  ,  END=  ,    )
, implied DO loops


Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.flang-compiler.org/pipermail/flang-dev_lists.flang-compiler.org/attachments/20181011/d79f397d/attachment.html>


More information about the flang-dev mailing list